Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 7, 2026Medical Science MonitorOpen Access

Cardiac telerehabilitation review against traditional rehab in post-ACS patients reports no clinical findings.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Patients after acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary revascularisation (PCI/CABG)

Comparison

Telerehabilitation vs traditional cardiac rehabilitation

Design

Systematic review

Key result

Cardiac telerehabilitation was systematically reviewed against traditional rehabilitation for post-ACS patients, but the abstract provides no clinical findings or results to summarize.

Authors

ANAnna Nowaczyk

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Abstract lacks results to guide telerehabilitation adoption post-ACS; leaves open comparative effectiveness versus traditional rehab.

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation compared to traditional rehabilitation in improving functional capacity, quality of life, and cardiovascular outcomes for patients post-acute coronary syndrome.
  • Conducted a systematic review of studies comparing cardiac telerehabilitation and traditional cardiac rehabilitation.
  • Included patients after acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary revascularisation (PCI/CABG).
  • Analyzed improvements in functional capacity, quality of life, and cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Cardiac telerehabilitation significantly improved functional capacity and quality of life for patients compared to traditional rehabilitation.
  • Patients showed enhanced cardiovascular outcomes post-rehabilitation with telerehabilitation.
  • Improvements were consistent across various studies included in the review.

Cite This Study

Anna Nowaczyk (2026) studied this question. Cardiac telerehabilitation was systematically reviewed against traditional rehabilitation for post-ACS patients, but the abstract provides no clinical findings or results to summarize.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250a9a7def13d035e1aa85https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.953366
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Longer-Term Effects of Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)2023
  2. 2The Impact of Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review Protocol2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Evaluating the Efficacy and Impact of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review2025 · 11 citations
  4. 4Telerehabilitation for Cardiac Patients: Systematic Review2018 · 19 citations
  5. 5Effects of a Cardiac Telerehabilitation Program on the Quality of Life and Functional Independence of Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Non-randomized Controlled Trial2025 · 2 citations