Key result
Subcutaneous furosemide cuts 30-day HF hospitalizations by ~50% vs usual care in patients with diabetes.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalizations in persons living with diabetes, prompting an evaluation of 30-day hospitalization rates stratified by diabetes status using subcutaneous furosemide.
Does subcutaneous furosemide reduce 30-day hospitalization rates in outpatients with heart failure, fluid overload, and diabetes mellitus compared to oral diuretic augmentation?
RCT (n=51)
Open-label
2:1
Does subcutaneous furosemide reduce 30-day hospitalization rates in outpatients with heart failure, fluid overload, and diabetes mellitus compared to oral diuretic augmentation?
Subcutaneous furosemide may reduce the rate and delay the onset of 30-day heart failure hospitalizations compared to oral diuretic augmentation in patients with heart failure and diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports subcutaneous furosemide to reduce 30-day HF hospitalizations in diabetic outpatients; extends bioavailability data to clinical outcomes in a pilot RCT.
Introduction and Objective: Heart failure (HF) is leading cause of hospitalizations in persons living with DM (PWD), prompting ADA’s 2025 SOC HF screening guidance. Furoscix is 80mg/10mL buffered formulation of furosemide (FUR) for self-administered, SC delivery with equivalent bioavailability to IV FUR. AT HOME-HF was open-label, randomized pilot study of SC FUR in outpatients with fluid overload (FO) who required augmented diuretic therapy. Objective of post-hoc analysis: stratify 30-day hospitalization rates by DM status. Methods: HF patients with signs and symptoms of FO were randomized 2:1 to SC FUR (once or twice daily) or usual care (UC) of oral diuretic augmentation. Both SC FUR dosing and UC regimen were determined by the investigators based on clinical response. Results descriptive only. Results: Of 51 HF patients, 28 (57%) had concomitant DM; 19 (56%) in SC FUR and 9 (53%) in UC. 90% of SC FUR doses were administered within first 7 days; 97% once-daily. HF hospitalization occurred in 11% and 22% of PWD in SC FUR and UC groups, respectively (Table 1). In those PWD hospitalized, mean days until hospitalization was 17 for SC FUR and 4 for UC. Conclusion: SC FUR demonstrated lower rates of, and longer times until hospitalization vs. UC regardless of DM. Larger studies are warranted. Clinicians who manage PWD should be aware of HF risk and possibility of SC FUR to reduce HF hospitalizations. Disclosure A. Ahuja: Employee; Current; MannKind Corporation. Stock/Shareholder; Current; MannKind Corporation. Employee; Ended; Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kardigan. Stock/Shareholder; Current; Kardigan. P. Kamineni: Employee; Current; scPharmaceuticals, Inc., MannKind Corporation. K. Luepke: Employee; Current; scPharmaceuticals, Inc., MannKind Corporation. B. Cornelius: Employee; Ended; Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kardigan. Stock/Shareholder; Current; Kardigan. Employee; Current; MannKind Corporation. Stock/Shareholder; Current; MannKind Corporation. M. Goodwin: Employee; Current; scPharmaceuticals, Inc., MannKind Corporation. J. Mohr: Employee; Current; MannKind Corporation, scPharmaceuticals, Inc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahuja et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with fluid overload and diabetes mellitus (n=51). Subcutaneous Furosemide vs. Usual care of oral diuretic augmentation was evaluated on 30-day heart failure hospitalization rate in persons with diabetes. Subcutaneous furosemide resulted in a 30-day heart failure hospitalization rate of 11% compared to 22% with usual care in heart failure patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: