Systematic review synthesizes challenges and solutions in Chinese national music education, suggesting multi-level strategies.
This systematic review synthesizes six years (2019–2025) of scholarly discourse on Chinese national music education in higher education. It employs Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory to diagnose multi-level challenges and strategize pathways for sustainable development, positioning the issue at the intersection of cultural policy, digital transformation, and human development in the Asia-Pacific region. Adhering rigorously to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a qualitative synthesis was conducted on 64 peer-reviewed studies from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database. The analysis employed a hybrid inductive-deductive approach: open coding allowed themes to emerge from the data, which were then systematically mapped onto Bronfenbrenner's ecological framework—macrosystem (policy/culture), mesosystem (institution), microsystem (pedagogy), and individual level (student)—with attention also to the chronosystem (temporal change). The ecosystem is characterized by policy-practice decoupling, curricular Westernization, a digital divide, and a crisis of cultural confidence. A paradigm shift is evident in post-2020 literature, advocating for digitally-enabled pedagogies (AI, VR), interdisciplinary “New Liberal Arts” fusion, and a transition from cultural inheritance to innovation. The findings underscore the necessity of synergistic, multi-level interventions. External validity concerns, similar to those noted in the broader Chinese educational research landscape, are also discussed. This is the first review to apply a robust ecological framework to this domain, transforming fragmented findings into a coherent diagnostic and strategic model. It explicitly links cultural heritage education to global development agendas and offers evidence-based, scalable policy insights for stakeholders across the Asia-Pacific, contributing to comparative studies on cultural sustainability in education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: