Key result
Sevoflurane linked to ~8.1-fold higher intraoperative vasopressor use compared to remimazolam.
Why the study?
Laparoscopic gynecological surgeries under general anesthesia can induce cardiovascular depression and hypotension, motivating a comparison of hemodynamic effects between remimazolam and sevoflurane.
Does remimazolam reduce the need for vasopressor support during laparoscopic gynecological surgery compared to sevoflurane-based anesthesia?
Cohort (n=474)
No
Does remimazolam reduce the need for vasopressor support during laparoscopic gynecological surgery compared to sevoflurane-based anesthesia?
Odds Ratio: 8.06 (95% CI 2.2–29.41)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.7% vs 19.5%
p-value: p=0.0016
Remimazolam provides superior intraoperative hemodynamic stability and significantly reduces the need for vasopressor support compared to sevoflurane in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Remimazolam was associated with less vasopressor use; leaves open whether it improves outcomes versus sevoflurane in randomized gynecological laparoscopy trials.
Objectives: Laparoscopic gynecological surgeries are commonly performed under general anesthesia and can induce cardiovascular depression and hypotension, requiring vasopressor support. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is used to treat minimal cardiovascular depression. This study compared the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and sevoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 474 patients who underwent laparoscopic gynecological surgery at Korea University Anam Hospital between September 2021 and December 2022. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the anesthetic agent used: remimazolam or sevoflurane. Hemodynamic parameters, vasopressor use, and intraoperative variables were compared between anesthetic agents. Propensity score matching was applied to account for potential confounders, and logistic regression was utilized to assess the relationship between anesthesia type and outcomes. Results: Remimazolam anesthesia was linked to a significantly lower incidence of vasopressor use compared to sevoflurane-based anesthesia (3.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.0001). The odds of requiring vasopressor support were significantly lower during the post-induction and maintenance phases in the remimazolam group. Furthermore, hemodynamic stability, particularly systolic and mean arterial pressures, was better maintained with remimazolam than sevoflurane. Conclusions: Remimazolam provides superior hemodynamic stability and reduces the need for vasopressor support during laparoscopic gynecological surgery compared with sevoflurane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seong et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Laparoscopic gynecological surgery (n=474). Remimazolam vs. Sevoflurane was evaluated on Total vasopressor use during surgery (OR 8.06, 95% CI 2.20-29.41, p=0.0016). Remimazolam significantly reduced the incidence of intraoperative vasopressor use to 3.7% compared to 19.5% with sevoflurane-based anesthesia (OR 8.06 for sevoflurane vs. remimazolam) in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: