Key result
Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with left main stem disease, requiring a Heart Team approach to guide management.
Why the study?
Although CABG has traditionally been standard for significant LMS disease, PCI using DES is now considered an acceptable alternative, prompting a review of landmark trials and guidelines.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents improve outcomes compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with significant left main stem disease?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents improve outcomes compared to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with significant left main stem disease?
Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with left main stem disease, emphasizing the necessity of a Heart Team approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports Heart Team selection for left main revascularization; leaves open optimal strategy amid comorbidities and absent new trials.
Introduction: Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has traditionally been the standard treatment for significant left main stem (LMS) disease, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents (DES) is now considered an acceptable alternative.Areas covered: This article aims to summarise the key findings of the landmark clinical trials on LMS revascularization and the recently published ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization related to LMS disease.Expert opinion: It is unlikely that there will be a further large randomized trial aimed at addressing the issue of the optimum method of revascularization for LMS disease. Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with LMS disease. ‘Heart Team’ approach is vital to guide the management of patients with LMS disease, when there is obvious clinical equipoise and a mandate for complete revascularization. With an aging and increasing co-morbid patient population, clinical equipoise may not always be obvious, making extrapolation of clinical trial results to the ‘real world’ difficult.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kassimis et al. (2019) conducted a review in Left main stem (LMS) disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was evaluated. Both PCI and CABG are reasonable revascularization options for appropriately selected patients with left main stem disease, requiring a Heart Team approach to guide management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: