Key result
Percutaneous and surgical revascularization remain key for left main and multivessel CAD, requiring heart teams.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass surgery improve survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with severe left main and multivessel coronary artery disease?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention compared to coronary artery bypass surgery improve survival and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with severe left main and multivessel coronary artery disease?
This review highlights that both PCI and CABG remain important strategies for left main and multivessel disease, emphasizing the necessity of a heart team approach for individualized decision-making.
Heart team evaluation warranted for left main/multivessel disease; leaves open optimal strategy with contemporary techniques.
Revascularization of severe left main and multivessel coronary artery disease has been shown to improve survival in both stable ischemic heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. While revascularization with coronary artery bypass surgery for these disease entities carries class I recommendation in most current guidelines, recent trials has shown potential comparable survival and cardiovascular outcomes between percutaneous and surgical interventions in patients with less complex coronary anatomy. Despite the conflicting results observed in the most recent left main revascularization trials, Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (EXCEL) and Nordic-Baltic-British left main revascularization (NOBLE), both treatment strategies remain important for the management of left main disease (LMD) and multivessel disease (MVD) reflecting on the importance of heart team discussion. This review is focused on revascularization of LMD and MVD in patients who are not presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, encompassing the evidence from historic and contemporary trials which shaped up current practices. This review discusses the heart team approach to guide decision making, including special populations that are not represented in clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Hijji et al. (2018) conducted a review in Left main and multivessel coronary artery disease. Percutaneous and surgical revascularization was evaluated. Percutaneous and surgical revascularization remain important strategies for managing left main and multivessel coronary artery disease, emphasizing the need for a heart team approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: