What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to compare the effects of Quantum Learning and Applied Learning on student achievement and motivation in science education.

Quantum Learning or Hands-on Learning: Which is More Effective in Science Education?

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

The aim is to compare the effects of Quantum Learning and Applied Learning on student achievement and motivation in science education.
Conducted a pre-test-post-test control group quasi-experimental design with 97 fourth-grade students.
Divided participants into two experimental groups for Quantum Learning and Applied Learning activities and one control group for the current curriculum.
Utilized achievement tests and attitude scales for data collection, analyzed with two-factor ANOVA and MANOVA.
Applied Learning significantly outperformed Quantum Learning in academic achievement (p<0.05).
Students in the Applied Learning group showed higher motivation levels compared to those in Quantum Learning (p<0.05).
Attitudes toward science education were more positive in the Applied Learning group versus the Quantum Learning group.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Randomized trial examines academic achievement and motivation in fourth-grade science education, suggesting applied learning is more effective.

Gökhan Uyanık (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Randomized trial examines academic achievement and motivation in fourth-grade science education, suggesting applied learning is more effective.