Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares HPV detection in self-collected urine and clinician-collected samples, suggesting potential for broader screening access.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to compare the novel INDICAID™ HPV (human papillomavirus) Urine Test using self-collected urine samples with the BD Onclarity™ HPV Assay using clinician-collected endocervical swabs in the detection of high-risk HPV in asymptomatic women. METHODS: Asymptomatic women aged 25 to 64 were consecutively recruited and asked to provide self-collected urine samples and clinician-collected endocervical swabs concurrently. The urine samples underwent the INDICAID™ HPV Urine Test for HPV DNA testing. The endocervical swabs were subjected to the BD Onclarity™ HPV Assay. The results of the 2 were compared. RESULTS: A total of 502 women were approached and 245 women agreed to provide paired samples. A total of 241 women were included in analysis. Cohen's Kappa values demonstrated a strong consistency between the 2 tests, with a k value of 0.887 for the detection of HPV 16 and HPV 18. The overall percent agreement showed a strong agreement between the 2 tests, with 99.6% for the detection of HPV 16 and HPV 18, and 94.5% for other high-risk HPV types. CONCLUSION: The results show that using self-collected urine to detect high-risk HPV using the INDICAID™ HPV Urine Test is comparable to using the BD Onclarity™ HPV Assay with clinician-collected vaginal samples. This demonstrates the accuracy of the novel INDICAID™ HPV Urine Test. The potential of urine-based screening as an alternative method is significant, particularly in enhancing participation in cervical cancer screening programs. This approach could be beneficial for subpopulations facing barriers to healthcare access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yung et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: