Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional analysis examines anxiety's effect on stress markers in patients prior to dental treatment, suggesting predictive value of anxiety assessments.
Introduction: We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the state anxiety scale as a pretreatment predictor of blood pressure, pulse rate, percutaneous arterial oxygen partial pressure, and salivary amylase activity before calculus removal and tooth extraction. Methods: To assess the patients’ anxiety levels before the dental procedure, the state anxiety scale was used. Vital signs, including blood pressure, pulse rate, and percutaneous arterial oxygen partial pressure, were measured at 2-minute intervals, 12 minutes before the initiation of calculus removal and tooth extraction using an automated sphygmomanometer. Salivary amylase activity was measured at 4-minute intervals, 12 minutes before the initiation of calculus removal and tooth extraction using the salivary amylase activity measuring device. Results: We found weak correlations between the state anxiety scale and psychological stress markers, including blood pressure, percutaneous arterial oxygen partial pressure, and salivary amylase activity, before scaling and extraction. Pulse rate showed a positive weak significant correlation with the state anxiety scale before scaling ( r = 0.26, P -value <0.05) and extraction ( r = 0.33, P -value <0.01). Diastolic blood pressure also showed a positive weak significant correlation with the state anxiety scale before extraction ( r = 0.27, P -value <0.01). Regression analysis showed that the state anxiety scale was the only significant predictor of pulse rate before scaling ( R 2 = 0.131, coefficient = 0.303, P -value = 0.043) and extraction ( R 2 = 0.159, coefficient = 0.264, P -value = 0.0059). Conclusion: The state anxiety scale is a significant pretreatment predictor of pulse rate before calculus removal, a noninvasive dental treatment, and tooth extraction, an invasive dental treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oike et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: