Prospective cohort study assesses systolic blood pressure impacts on outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, highlighting management importance.
Background Optimal blood pressure management after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains uncertain. To assess peri-thrombolysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) dynamics and to examine the associations of mean SBP, SBP variability, and SBP reduction magnitude with 90-day functional outcome and 24-h intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS. Methods In this single-center prospective observational cohort study, 340 consecutive patients with AIS treated with intravenous thrombolysis were included. SBP was summarized across predefined time windows: pre-thrombolysis, during thrombolysis, and 0–2 h, 2–6 h, 6–12 h, and 12–24 h after thrombolysis. The primary outcome was unfavorable 90-day functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin scale score 3–6. The secondary outcome was 24-h ICH. Results Of the 340 patients included, 126 (37.06%) had an unfavorable 90-day outcome. After adjustment, each 10-mmHg increase in mean SBP was associated with higher odds of unfavorable outcome in the pre-thrombolysis period (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.03–1.43), during thrombolysis (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.39), at 0–2 h (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06–1.49), at 2–6 h (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.46), and at 6–12 h (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01–1.41). In categorical analysis, an early mean SBP of 120–140 mmHg was associated with lower risk of unfavorable outcome at 0–2 h (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27–0.96), whereas SBP ≥ 160 mmHg was associated with increased risk at both 0–2 h (aOR 2.34, 95% CI 1.23–4.47) and 2–6 h (aOR 3.12, 95% CI 1.45–6.72). Greater early SBP reduction was associated with lower 24-h ICH risk, particularly at 0–2 h (absolute reduction: aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85–0.97; relative reduction: aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75–0.95) and 2–6 h (absolute reduction: aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.95; relative reduction: aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72–0.91). Conclusions Higher mean SBP across early time windows, particularly within the first 6 h after thrombolysis, was independently associated with an unfavorable 90-day outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: