Randomized trial examines the geometry of matter-antimatter asymmetry, suggesting new insights into fundamental physics.
The apparent excess of matter over antimatter in the observable universe is one of the deepest unresolved problems in physics. Standard approaches invoke CP-violation mechanisms and the Sakharov conditions to generate a matter surplus from a symmetric initial state. This paper develops a Quantum-Geometry Dynamics (QGD) account that dissolves the asymmetry geometrically, requiring no such mechanisms, no CP-violation parameters, and no departure from standard deterministic preonic dynamics. Building on the structural definition of an antiparticle as a mirror-image p-gravity equilibrium configuration, and the transverse-deflection mechanism of electromagnetic polarisation, this paper demonstrates that the apparent matter-antimatter asymmetry is a visibility asymmetry, not a count excess. Core Structural Derivations: The Polarisation "Dead Zone": The electromagnetic polarisation field is intrinsically anisotropic, vanishing along the spin axis: Πa(ψ) = Πmax · sin(ψ). The Partial-Merger Bifurcation: For particle-antiparticle pairs approaching within this polar dead zone (ψ < ψc), electromagnetic attraction is insufficient to drive the pair to the minimum volume threshold. The approach is p-gravity-dominated, allowing the polar preon(+) core to satisfy the binding condition and form a stable partial-merger composite, while the equatorial sub-population dissolves into photons. The 1/ma² Scaling Law: The fraction of encounters producing stable composites scales strictly as 1/ma², making heavy composite formation structurally inevitable in the early universe. Nucleon-Sequestered Antimatter: The stable composites formed by polar encounters of heavy pairs are sequestered as electromagnetically neutral or weakly polarising sub-structures within nucleons. This framework maps these sequestered antiparticle-type sub-structures directly onto the "sea quarks" observed in Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS), providing a deterministic geometric origin for the composition of the nucleon sea and a structural explanation for the Gottfried sum rule violation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniel Burnstein (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: