Key result
Device-related complications were a major predictor of deteriorated quality of life in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.0; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators may significantly impact life, prompting an analysis of their effect on quality-of-life metrics from the patient perspective.
How does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy impact long-term quality of life from the patient's perspective?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,809)
Yes
How does implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy impact long-term quality of life from the patient's perspective?
Odds Ratio: 2.1 (95% CI 1.4–3)
p-value: p=<0.001
Most patients report preserved or improved quality of life after ICD implantation, though device-related complications significantly deteriorate QoL.
Device complications warrant QoL monitoring in ICD patients; this cross-sectional association leaves open causal effects and prevention benefits.
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may impact patients' life significantly. The aim of this survey was to analyse the impact of the ICD on quality of life (QoL) metrics from the patient's perspective. 'Living with an ICD' was a prospective, multicentre study with an online questionnaire submitted to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Research Network centres as well as patient associations from 10 European countries; it was filled-in directly and personally by the patients that were invited to participate, with a minimal interaction or influence from the healthcare professionals. Overall, the questionnaire was completed by 1809 patients (624 women, 34.5%). Patients in their 60s and 70s and from Western Europe were the most represented. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (IQR 2-10). Device-related complications were reported by 505 patients (22.4%), including one or more inappropriate shocks (n = 209, 11.6%). Almost half the respondents reported improved QoL, with a more favourable impact for those receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), and only a 10th experienced a significant decrease in QoL. The occurrence of complications remained a major predictor of deteriorated QoL (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.0, P < 0.001). In conclusion, most patients have a globally positive view and acceptance of ICD therapy, reporting preserved to improved QoL after device implantation. Complications, namely inappropriate shocks, affect the expectation of living a normal life post-implant and are associated with a significant decrease in QoL. Our findings also highlight the importance of a detailed informed consent process and the involvement of the patient in the decision-making process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Januszkiewicz et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (n=1,809). Device-related complications vs. No complications was evaluated on Deteriorated quality of life (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.0, p=<0.001). Device-related complications were a major predictor of deteriorated quality of life in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.0; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: