Key result
Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias post-ablation linked to ~4-fold higher risk of new-onset HF.
Why the study?
The incidence and predictors of new-onset HF after catheter ablation for AF remain unclear, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction and no prior HF.
Observational (n=480)
No
Hazard Ratio: 4.028 (95% CI 1.564–10.378)
p-value: p=0.004
In patients with preserved ejection fraction and no prior heart failure, new-onset heart failure after atrial fibrillation ablation is uncommon but strongly predicted by late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias, highlighting the importance of durable rhythm control.
Recurrent ATs may predict new-onset HF after AF ablation in preserved EF; leaves open causal inference and need for prospective trials.
Background: The incidence and predictors of new-onset heart failure (HF) after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (EF ≥50%) and no prior HF. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 480 consecutive patients with EF ≥50% and no prior HF who underwent initial AF ablation. Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) and new-onset HF were assessed during follow up. Landmark analyses at 3 and 12 months after the first procedure were performed to evaluate predictors of new-onset HF and the association between recurrence of early ATs and subsequent HF. Additionally, recurrence of ATs after the final ablation was examined as a time-dependent covariate using a Cox proportional hazards model. During a median follow up of 70 months (interquartile range 60–84 months), 18 (3.75%) patients developed new-onset HF. Age >75 years was the only consistent independent predictor in both landmark analyses. Early recurrence of ATs within 3 or 12 months was not associated with HF development. However, recurrence of ATs after the final procedure was independently associated with new-onset HF in a time-dependent analysis (hazard ratio 4.028; 95% confidence interval 1.564–10.378; P=0.004). Conclusions: In patients with preserved EF and no prior HF, new-onset HF after AF ablation was uncommon but clinically relevant. Durable rhythm control may be important to reduce HF risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisaoka et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation with preserved ejection fraction (n=480). Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after final ablation procedure vs. No recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias was evaluated on New-onset heart failure (HR 4.028, 95% CI 1.564-10.378, p=0.004). In patients with preserved ejection fraction and no prior heart failure, recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias after the final ablation procedure was independently associated with an increased risk of new-onset heart failure (HR 4.028).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: