Why the study?
Identifying patients who will have an increase in cardiac output from volume administration is difficult, prompting evaluation of non-invasive carotid flow time to determine volume responsiveness.
Does carotid flow time measurement via point-of-care ultrasound accurately predict volume responsiveness compared to invasive pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in critically ill ICU patients?
Does carotid flow time measurement via point-of-care ultrasound accurately predict volume responsiveness compared to invasive pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in critically ill ICU patients?
Corrected carotid flow time measured by point-of-care ultrasound is a highly accurate, non-invasive method for predicting volume responsiveness in critically ill patients.
Carotid flow time may aid non-invasive volume responsiveness assessment in critical care; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Objectives: Identifying patients who will have an increase in their cardiac output from volume administration is difficult to identify. We propose the use of carotid flow time, which is a non-invasive means to determine if a patient is volume responsive. Methods: Patients admitted to a critical care unit with a pulmonary artery catheter in place were enrolled. We perform a carotid flow time and pulmonary artery catheter measurement of cardiac output pre and post-passive leg raise and comparing the two. An increase of 10% change in the pre- vs. post-passive leg raise measurement would be indicative of a patient who is volume responsive. Results: We identified 8 patients who were volume responsive as determined by the gold standard pulmonary artery catheter. The sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 90.9%. Pearson correlation coefficient between PA-CO measurements and CFT was r=0.8316, indicative of strong correlation between the two measurements. Conclusion: In our patient sample of critically ill patients with pulmonary artery catheters, we found a strong correlation between corrected carotid flow times and cardiac output measurements from pulmonary artery catheters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jelić et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: