Why the study?
Previous studies reported physical activity subjectively and only included symptomatic AF, leaving the relationship between accelerometer-measured physical activity and both symptomatic and asymptomatic AF unclear.
Does physical activity level affect the risk of incident atrial fibrillation detected on implantable loop recorder in men without prior AF?
Population
864 men without history or symptoms of AF from the VENTOUX and LOOP studies
Comparison
Physical activity levels assessed via ILR accelerometer
Design
Individual participant pooled analysis
Follow-up
First 3 years
Key result
Physical activity duration was not associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation detected on implantable loop recorder (HR 0.937; 95% CI 0.835-1.050; P=0.263).
Authors
Loading...
No increased AF risk after adjustment in athletes; leaves open dose-response effects in larger cohorts.
Observational (n=864)
Yes
Does physical activity level affect the risk of incident atrial fibrillation detected on implantable loop recorder in men without prior AF?
Hazard Ratio: 0.937 (95% CI 0.835–1.05)
p-value: p=0.263
Physical activity level was not associated with incident AF detected on ILR, but higher physical activity was associated with a greater likelihood of being symptomatic at AF onset.
Chambers et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=864). Physical activity vs. Lower physical activity was evaluated on Time to onset of first AF episode lasting ≥6 minutes occurring within the first 3 years (HR 0.937, 95% CI 0.835-1.050, p=0.263). Physical activity duration was not associated with an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation detected on implantable loop recorder (HR 0.937; 95% CI 0.835-1.050; P=0.263).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: