Why the study?
Sex-specific risk patterns and the temporal relationship between AF and MI subtypes, including STEMI and NSTEMI, remain unclear.
Does incident atrial fibrillation increase the risk of myocardial infarction, STEMI, and NSTEMI differently by sex and time since diagnosis in a general population?
Population
25,132 participants without prevalent AF and MI at baseline in 1994-95
Comparison
Participants with AF vs participants without AF
Design
Population-based cohort study
Follow-up
1994-95 through 2021
Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased hazard of myocardial infarction in women (sHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.72) but not in men, with risk patterns varying by time since diagnosis.
Authors
Loading...
AF may confer greater long-term MI risk in women than men; leaves open whether sex- or time-specific prevention alters outcomes.
Cohort (n=25,132)
Does incident atrial fibrillation increase the risk of myocardial infarction, STEMI, and NSTEMI differently by sex and time since diagnosis in a general population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.39 (95% CI 1.12–1.72)
The risk of myocardial infarction following an atrial fibrillation diagnosis exhibits distinct sex-specific temporal patterns, with women facing long-term NSTEMI risk and men facing short-term STEMI/NSTEMI risk.
Nilsen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction (n=25,132). Atrial fibrillation vs. Participants without atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Myocardial infarction (MI) (sHR 1.39, 95% CI 1.12-1.72). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased hazard of myocardial infarction in women (sHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.12-1.72) but not in men, with risk patterns varying by time since diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: