Prospective cohort examines adipokine biomarkers in ICU patients, indicating potential roles in mortality assessment.
Background/Objectives: Adipokines are candidate biomarkers in critical illness due to their roles in immunity and metabolism, both profoundly altered in sepsis. Omentin-1, vaspin, and chemerin have been studied in selected septic cohorts, but not concurrently in a heterogeneous ICU population including both septic and non-septic patients. Methods: Prospective observational cohort of 200 consecutive ICU patients with 28-day follow-up. Biomarkers were measured by ELISA within 24 h of admission. Analyses included Mann–Whitney U tests, Spearman correlations, ROC curves, and logistic regression with APACHE II and SOFA as comparators. Results: Vaspin was significantly higher in septic versus non-septic patients (406.4 [190.0–799.6] vs. 275.8 [101.8–559.8] pg/mL; p = 0.009). Omentin-1 was elevated in 28-day non-survivors (34.4 [22.5–56.1] vs. 25.1 [15.0–48.4] ng/mL; p = 0.037; AUROC 0.599), but lost significance after APACHE II adjustment (p = 0.295). Chemerin trended lower in non-survivors (p = 0.099); in septic patients, it correlated inversely with SOFA (r = −0.43) and lactate (r = −0.40), both p < 0.001. IL-6 and IL-10 were higher in non-survivors; IL-10 predicted 28-day mortality (AUROC 0.783), comparable to APACHE II (0.785). Conclusions: Vaspin distinguishes sepsis in mixed ICU populations. Omentin-1 shows a severity-driven association with mortality that does not survive APACHE II adjustment (AUROC 0.599, poor standalone discrimination), while chemerin inversely tracks hypoperfusion markers in septic patients, suggesting a potential counter-regulatory role requiring mechanistic confirmation. Individually, these adipokines do not add prognostic value beyond established severity scores, but their biological orthogonality to classical cytokines warrants exploration in multi-marker panel studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannopoulou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: