Key result
PM-HFpEF protocol outlines structured screening to determine HFpEF prevalence among patients with permanent pacemakers.
Why the study?
Pacemaker patients may be particularly vulnerable to HFpEF due to clustered risk factors and RV pacing hemodynamics, yet HFpEF is rarely systematically assessed in device clinics.
What is the prevalence of HFpEF in adult patients with conventional transvenous pacemakers and right ventricular apical pacing?
Cross-Sectional
No
What is the prevalence of HFpEF in adult patients with conventional transvenous pacemakers and right ventricular apical pacing?
The PM-HFpEF study protocol outlines a structured screening approach to determine the prevalence and clinical profile of HFpEF in patients with permanent pacemakers and right ventricular apical pacing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HFpEF may be underrecognized in PM patients; this cross-sectional protocol leaves open its prevalence and need for routine device-clinic screening.
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in older multimorbid patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Pacemaker (PM) patients may be particularly vulnerable given the clustering of conventional HFpEF risk factors and the hemodynamic effects of long-term right ventricular pacing. Nevertheless, HFpEF is rarely systematically assessed in device clinics. Objectives To determine the prevalence of HFpEF in a cohort of permanent PM patients using a structured guideline-aligned screening protocol and to characterize their clinical, functional, and pacing-related profiles. Methods PM-HFpEF is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study conducted at a tertiary hospital in Portugal. Eligible adults with conventional transvenous pacemakers and right ventricular apical pacing implanted between January 2018 and December 2022 will be invited to attend a one-day screening visit. The protocol includes clinical assessment, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing, 12-lead electrocardiography, comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, routine device interrogation, frailty assessment (the Portuguese-validated version of the Edmonton Frail Scale), and health-related quality-of-life evaluation using the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Exercise diastolic stress echocardiography using an upper-limb ergometer will be performed when resting findings are inconclusive. HFpEF will be adjudicated according to the 2021 European Society of Cardiology diagnostic definition. Discussion The PM-HFpEF study is designed to provide robust estimates of HFpEF prevalence within a real-world PM population, together with detailed characterization of their clinical and device-related profiles. This information may help inform future clinical assessment and research strategies for this often-overlooked yet clinically significant group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Structured guideline-aligned screening protocol for HFpEF was evaluated on Prevalence of HFpEF. The PM-HFpEF study protocol outlines a structured screening approach to determine the prevalence and clinical profiles of HFpEF among adult patients with permanent pacemakers.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: