Key result
ICD recipients show modestly lower physical and mental quality of life versus matched norms.
Why the study?
Decisions regarding ICDs require information about presumed HRQL, motivating an assessment of HRQL in patients with an ICD compared to population norms.
Does having an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduce health-related quality of life in patients compared to age- and sex-matched norms?
Cross-Sectional (n=223)
Does having an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) reduce health-related quality of life in patients compared to age- and sex-matched norms?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.31
Absolute Event Rate: 40.7% vs 44.4%
p-value: p=0.0052
Patients with ICDs experience slightly lower physical and mental health-related quality of life compared to the general population, though the differences are small and not worsened by shocks or complications.
Small HRQoL decrements in ICD patients merit clinical awareness; cross-sectional data leave open causality and need prospective confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: Decisions regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) must consider information about presumed health-related quality of life (HRQL). The purpose of the study was to assess HRQL in patients with ICD and compare it to a Swedish age-matched and sex-matched population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational trial. SETTING: Swedish ICD cohort. INTERVENTIONS: Short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires from ICD recipients implanted 2007-2017 (response rate 77.2%) were analysed using Mann-Whitney U test and effect size (ES). RESULTS: In total, 223 patients (mean age 71.1±9.7 years, 82.1% men) were included. In most SF-36 domains (physical functioning (PF), role physical, general health (GH), vitality, social functioning and mental health), the score for patients with ICD was significantly lower (ES range 0.23-0.41, ie, small difference) than norms, except for bodily pain and role emotional. Both the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS) scores had ES=0.31. Men and women had similar scores. Primary and secondary prevention patients scored similarly, except for worse GH in primary prevention (p=0.016, ES=0.35). Atrial fibrillation was associated with worse PF (ES=0.41) and PCS (ES=0.38). Appropriate therapy, inappropriate shock or complications requiring surgery were not associated with lower scores in any domain. In primary prevention due to ischaemic versus non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, no domain was significantly different. PCS decreased with higher age strata (p=0.002) in contrast to MCS (p=0.986). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICDs have lower physical and mental HRQL than age-matched and sex-matched norms; however, the ESs are small. HRQL is similar regardless of sex, primary/secondary prevention indication, appropriate therapy, inappropriate shock or complications, but decreases with advancing age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Magnusson et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients (n=223). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) vs. Age-matched and sex-matched general Swedish population norms was evaluated on SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (ES 0.31, p=0.0052). Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators had lower physical and mental health-related quality of life than matched norms, with small effect sizes (ES 0.31 for both component summaries).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: