Key result
A >10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with a significant improvement in survival (HR 0.58) and a decreased likelihood of receiving appropriate ICD shocks.
Why the study?
Many patients in SCD-HeFT had a significant improvement (> 10%) in LVEF, but the factors and outcomes associated with this improvement were uncertain.
Does a >10% improvement in LVEF improve survival and reduce appropriate ICD shocks in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=837)
Yes
Does a >10% improvement in LVEF improve survival and reduce appropriate ICD shocks in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.58 (95% CI 0.35–0.96)
In patients with HFrEF, a >10% improvement in LVEF is associated with significantly improved survival and a reduced risk of appropriate ICD shocks, highlighting the prognostic importance of LVEF recovery.
LVEF improvement may refine prognosis in HF; this Level 5 analysis leaves open whether serial imaging should guide therapy.
BACKGROUND: Many patients in the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) had a significant improvement (> 10%) in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during the course of the study, but the factors and outcomes associated with such improvement are uncertain. METHODS: We examined factors and rates of mortality, cause-specific mortality, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks associated with improvement in LVEF by analyzing patients in the SCD-HeFT who were randomized to placebo or an ICD and who had an LVEF checked during follow-up. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.99 years, of 837 patients who had at least two follow-up LVEF measurements, 276 (33%) patients had > 10% improvement in LVEF and 561 (67%) patients had no significant change in LVEF. Factors significantly associated with LVEF improvement included female sex, white race, history of hypertension, a QRS duration < 120 ms, and beta-blocker use. Improvement in LVEF was associated with a significant improvement in survival. There was no significant association between improvement in LVEF and cause-specific death, but there was a significant association between improvement in LVEF and reduced risk of receiving appropriate ICD shocks. CONCLUSIONS: About a third of patients in this analysis, who were randomized to placebo or an ICD in SCD-HeFT, had a significant improvement in LVEF during follow-up; improvement in LVEF was associated with improved survival but not with cause-specific death, and with decreased likelihood of receiving appropriate ICD shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eiger et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (cardiomyopathy) (n=837). >10% improvement in LVEF vs. ≤10% improvement in LVEF was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96). A >10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with a significant improvement in survival (HR 0.58) and a decreased likelihood of receiving appropriate ICD shocks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: