Key result
Transvenous lead extraction improves tricuspid function in ~35% of lead-dependent dysfunction, boosting long-term survival.
Why the study?
Lead-related tricuspid valve dysfunction has not been evaluated in a large population and its management remains controversial.
Does transvenous lead extraction improve tricuspid valve function and long-term survival in patients with lead-dependent tricuspid valve dysfunction?
Cohort (n=2,678)
Yes
Does transvenous lead extraction improve tricuspid valve function and long-term survival in patients with lead-dependent tricuspid valve dysfunction?
Lead extraction improves tricuspid valve function in roughly one-third of patients with lead-dependent tricuspid dysfunction, which directly translates to better long-term survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TLE-associated tricuspid improvement linked to survival in LDTVD; leaves open causal benefit and needs randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Lead-related tricuspid valve dysfunction (LDTVD) has not been studied in a large population and its management remains controversial. METHODS: An analysis of the clinical data of 2678 patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in years 2008-2021 was conducted, with a separate group of 119 patients with LDTVD. Potential risk factors for LDTVD, improvement in valve function, and long-term prognosis after TLE were assessed. RESULTS: LDTVD was diagnosed in 4.44% of patients referred for lead extraction due to different reasons. The most common mechanism of LDTVD was propping upward or clamping down the leaflet by the lead (85.71%). The probability of LDTVD was higher in female sex, patients with valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, large right ventricle and high pulmonary artery systolic pressure, the presence of only pacing lead, and in case of collision of the lead with tricuspid valve and adhesion of the lead to the heart structures. The prognosis of patients with LDTVD was worse, however, patients with improved valve function after TLE showed a significantly better long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Lead dependent tricuspid valve dysfunction is a potentially serious condition that requires thorough diagnostics and thoughtful management. The risk factors for LDTVD are primarily related to the course of the lead and its adhesion to the heart structures. Improvement of tricuspid valve function after TLE is observed in 35.29% of patients Patients with LDTVD have a worse long-term survival, but the improvement in valve function following TLE contributes to a significant reduction in mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polewczyk et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) requiring transvenous lead extraction (n=2,678). Transvenous lead extraction was evaluated on Improvement of tricuspid valve function after transvenous lead extraction in patients with lead-dependent tricuspid valve dysfunction. Transvenous lead extraction led to an improvement in tricuspid valve function in 35.29% of patients with lead-dependent tricuspid valve dysfunction, which was associated with significantly better long-term survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: