Key result
Cardiac catheterization laboratory cancellation was associated with an increased adjusted risk for all-cause mortality compared with emergent angiography.
Why the study?
Does emergent coronary angiography compared with CCL cancellation affect mortality in patients presenting as STEMI activations?
Cohort (n=1,332)
Does emergent coronary angiography compared with CCL cancellation affect mortality in patients presenting as STEMI activations?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patients with canceled STEMI activations represent a high-risk population with higher adjusted long-term mortality compared to those receiving emergent angiography.
Background: Prehospital ECG-based cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction reduces door-to-balloon times, but CCL cancellations (CCL X ) remain a challenging problem. We examined the reasons for CCL X , clinical characteristics, and outcomes of patients presenting as ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction activations who receive emergent coronary angiography (EA) compared with CCL X . Methods and Results: We reviewed all consecutive CCL activations between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014 (n=1332). Data were analyzed comparing 2 groups stratified as EA (n=466) versus CCL X (n=866; 65%). Reasons for CCL X included bundle branch block (21%), poor-quality prehospital ECG (18%), non–ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction ST changes (18%), repolarization abnormality (13%), and arrhythmia (8%). A multivariate logistic regression model using age, peak troponin, and initial ECG findings had a high discriminatory value for determining EA versus CCL X (C statistic, 0.985). CCL X subjects were older and more likely to be women, have prior coronary artery bypass grafting, or a paced rhythm ( P <0.0001 for all). All-cause mortality did not differ between groups at 1 year or during the study period (mean follow-up, 2.186±1.167 years; 15.8% EA versus 16.2% CCL X ; P =0.9377). Cardiac death was higher in the EA group (11.8% versus 3.0%; P <0.0001). After adjusting for clinical variables associated with survival, CCL X was associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality during the study period (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28–2.59; P =0.0009). Conclusions: In this study, prehospital ECG without overreading or transmission lead to frequent CCL X . CCL X subjects differ with regard to age, sex, risk factors, and comorbidities. However, CCL X patients represent a high-risk population, with frequently positive cardiac enzymes and similar short- and long-term mortality compared with EA. Further studies are needed to determine how quality improvement initiatives can lower the rates of CCL X and influence clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (n=1,332). Cardiac catheterization laboratory cancellation vs. Emergent coronary angiography was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.28-2.59, p=0.0009). Cardiac catheterization laboratory cancellation was associated with an increased adjusted risk for all-cause mortality compared with emergent angiography.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: