Comparative Analysis of Assessment Questions in the College Scholastic Ability Test Chemistry (Ⅰ․Ⅱ) and the IBDP Chemistry Using a Two-dimensional Taxonomy

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This study examines the differences in assessment questions between the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) and IBDP Chemistry using Bloom's taxonomy.
Compared assessment questions of CSAT Chemistry and IBDP Chemistry based on the 2015 curriculum.
Utilized Bloom's two-dimensional taxonomy for evaluation.
Analyzed questions from both standard level (SL) and higher level (HL) of IBDP.
CSAT Chemistry questions show 65% procedural knowledge and 80% emphasis on lower-level cognitive processes.
IBDP Chemistry demonstrates a balance with 60.9% conceptual knowledge and inclusion of higher-order cognitive processes.
The analysis reveals significant incorporation of metacognitive knowledge in IBDP, indicating a need for multifaceted assessment approaches.

Comparative analysis reveals differences in assessment design between Korean SAT and IBDP Chemistry, suggesting improvements.

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Hye Sook Cho (2026) studied this question.

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share