Key result
Aspirin increases significant bleeding ~126% vs placebo among older adults at lowest baseline risk.
Why the study?
It remains unclear whether all older adults face uniform aspirin-related bleeding risk or if certain subgroups are more vulnerable.
Does aspirin therapy increase bleeding risk heterogeneously across different baseline risk groups in older adults?
RCT (n=19,114)
Double-blind
1:1 computer-generated
Yes
Does aspirin therapy increase bleeding risk heterogeneously across different baseline risk groups in older adults?
Effect estimate: HR 2.26 (95% CI 1.27-4.01)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.06% vs 0.59%
p-value: p=0.027 for interaction
In older adults, those at the lowest baseline bleeding risk experienced the greatest relative increase in bleeding risk with aspirin therapy, supporting individualized risk-based decision-making.
Variable bleeding risk supports personalized aspirin decisions in older adults; extends ASPREE via ML-identified heterogeneity.
Aim The global population of older adults is growing, and older age is linked to higher bleeding risk. Although guidelines discourage aspirin for primary prevention in healthy older adults due to bleeding harms outweighing benefits, many continue taking it without a clear indication. It remains unclear whether all older adults face uniform aspirin-related bleeding risk or if certain subgroups are more vulnerable. Methods We analyzed data from 19,114 ASPREE trial participants to develop machine learning models using 116 baseline variables. Random forest (RF) and random survival forest (RSF) models predicted 5-year bleeding risk, and participants were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups based on the 20th and 80th percentiles of predicted risk. We assessed heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) by testing treatment-by-risk group interactions on the relative scale using Fine-Gray models, and on the absolute scale using observed 5-year cumulative incidence rates. Results Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 626 major bleeding events occurred. The RF model had moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.63-0.67) and good calibration (Brier = 0.032, 95% CI: 0.029-0.034). Statistically significant HTE was observed on the relative scale, with the greatest relative increase in bleeding risk seen in the low-risk group (subdistribution hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.27–4.01). On the absolute scale, low-risk participants experienced higher bleeding with aspirin (absolute risk difference (ARD) = 1.17%, 95% CI: 0.37–1.95), but heterogeneity in ARDs was not statistically significant (Cochran’s Q p > 0.45). Similar findings were observed when using the RSF model. Conclusion Participants at lowest baseline bleeding risk experienced the greatest relative increase in bleeding risk with aspirin therapy. We found statistically significant heterogeneity in treatment effects on the relative but not absolute scale. These findings support an individualized, risk-based approach to aspirin therapy decision-making in older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzimas et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Primary prevention in healthy older adults (n=19,114). Enteric-coated aspirin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Clinically significant bleeding (low baseline risk group) (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.27-4.01, p=0.027 for interaction). Aspirin therapy caused the greatest relative increase in clinically significant bleeding among older adults at the lowest baseline bleeding risk (HR 2.26) compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: