Comparative analysis identifies risk factors for breast cancer recurrence, suggesting personalized treatment approaches.
Objective: To study the nature and frequency of breast cancer recurrence, taking into account the clinical, morphological and molecular biological characteristics of the tumor. Materials and Methods: A comparative analysis of data from 208 breast cancer patients was conducted, divided into two groups: a study group (104 patients with verified recurrence) and a control group (104 patients with no signs of recurrence over a follow-up period of >=5 years). The analysis included a detailed examination of parameters such as age, menstrual status, tumor histology, TNM stage, grade of differentiation (G), and molecular subtypes (ER, RP, HER2, and Ki-67). Results: The average age in the relapse group was 48.7 years, while in the control group it was 50.1 years. In the control group, there was a significant predominance of patients aged 50-59 years (55.8% versus 37.5%; p<0.001). In the relapse group, locally advanced stages (IIIA-IIIC - 66.3%) and metastatic stages (IV - 10.6%) were diagnosed more often. Poorly differentiated tumors were also detected significantly more often (G3: 41.3% versus 14.4%, p<0.001). Analysis of molecular subtypes revealed that aggressive forms of breast cancer were more common in the study group: luminal B HER2-negative (40.4%), HER2+ non-luminal (12.5%), and triple-negative breast cancer (10.6%). In the control group, luminal A subtype predominated (43.3%; p<0.001). Histological tumor type and menopausal status did not independently influence prognosis. Conclusion: The risk of breast cancer recurrence depends on many factors. The most important are the extent of the disease at advanced stages (III-IV), low cell differentiation (G3), aggressive molecular subtypes (HER2 and triple-negative), and young patient age. These data justify the need for personalized risk stratification to optimize adjuvant therapy strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loik Abduvakhobovich Sufiyev (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: