Addition of CAD polygenic risk score to coronary artery calcium score enhances prediction of MACE.

Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) is prevalent in the United States, highlighting the need for accurate risk prediction to inform primary prevention strategies. While multivariate risk models like the Framingham Risk Score and ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations are commonly utilized, novel risk markers, such as the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and polygenic risk score (PRS), are increasingly gaining recognition.Objectives This study aimed to compare the diagnostic utility of CACS and CAD PRS, both individually and in combination, for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort comprising 1,380 predominantly Caucasian participants from the Sanford Health System. CAD PRS was constructed using genetic variants, while CACS was assessed via cardiac computed tomography (CT). Statistical analyses evaluated the relationship between each modality and MACE.Results Both CAD PRS and CACS were significantly associated with future MACE. Following the adjustment for covariates, the area under the curve (AUC) for both the CACS and PRS models was comparable, indicating similar predictive capabilities for MACE. However, the combination of CAD PRS with CACS significantly enhanced predictive accuracy, outperforming either modality alone.Conclusions This study underscores the value of integrating CACS and CAD PRS in predicting MACE. The synergistic effect of CAD PRS combined with CACS markedly improves predictive power. Further research and prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and assess their clinical implications. Investigating the interactions between PRS and CACS will be crucial for refining cardiovascular risk prediction and optimizing prevention strategies.