Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review summarizes the role of polygenic risk scores in genetic risk prediction for coronary artery disease, indicating potential benefits for targeted prevention.
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) aggregate the effects of many common genetic variants and are being investigated as tools to refine coronary artery disease (CAD) risk prediction beyond traditional clinical models. Methods and Results: We review the development of PRS from early unweighted scores to contemporary genome-wide models and summarize evidence from major studies. We identified key studies through PubMed searches using the terms “polygenic risk score,” “genetic risk prediction,” and “coronary artery disease,” supplemented by citation chaining of highly cited articles and recent reviews. Large cohorts, such as the UK Biobank, show that individuals in the highest PRS percentiles have a 3–5-fold higher risk of CAD, and may gain the greatest benefit from statin therapy. PRS can also reclassify younger adults at borderline or intermediate risk and may complement coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. Conclusions: PRSs hold promise for lifetime risk stratification and targeted prevention in CAD but are limited by ancestry bias in GWAS, underrepresentation of diverse populations, inconsistency in individual estimates, and lack of standardized reporting. Future research should focus on expanding multi-ancestry databases, standardizing methods, prospective validation, and effective communication strategies to support equitable and evidence-based clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ansari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: