Key result
Regional anesthesia linked to ~70% fewer 30-day major events vs general in hip fracture surgery.
Why the study?
Surgical fixation of hip fractures in older adults carries significant morbidity and mortality, prompting investigation into whether regional anesthesia reduces postoperative complications compared to general or spinal anesthesia.
Does regional anesthesia reduce the 30-day composite of death, MI, or stroke in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to general or spinal anesthesia?
Cohort (n=54,623)
Yes
Does regional anesthesia reduce the 30-day composite of death, MI, or stroke in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to general or spinal anesthesia?
Relative Risk: 0.3 (95% CI 0.2–0.6)
Absolute Event Rate: 3% vs 7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Regional anesthesia (likely peripheral nerve block) is associated with lower rates of 30-day death, MI, or stroke compared to general or spinal anesthesia in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery, especially in high-risk patients.
May support regional anesthesia preference in hip fracture surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
Introduction Surgical fixation of hip fractures in older adults is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether regional anesthesia, which excluded epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal, was associated with lower postoperative complication rates compared to general or spinal anesthesia in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture dataset from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching was used to compare regional anesthesia with general and spinal anesthesia. Given the NSQIP database excludes epidural, spinal, and combined epidural-spinal anesthesia from the regional classification, it was presumed that the remaining regional anesthesia patients received a peripheral nerve block. The primary outcome measure was a 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results The study analyzed 54,623 patients, from which 323 received regional anesthesia. These were separately matched with 323 cases of general anesthesia and 323 cases of spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of the primary composite outcome compared to both general anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6, P < 0.001) and spinal anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9, P = 0.01). A subgroup effect was detected, with high-risk patients (ASA IV–V) experiencing the greatest protective benefit from regional anesthesia. Conclusions Regional anesthesia techniques, excluding epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal techniques, were associated with lower rates of major postoperative complications in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to general or spinal anesthesia. This benefit was more pronounced in high-risk patients. Our findings suggest that regional anesthesia, most likely administered via a peripheral nerve block, may offer benefits beyond pain control in this population, potentially improving postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torrie et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Hip fracture (n=54,623). Regional anesthesia vs. General or spinal anesthesia was evaluated on 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6, p=<0.001). Regional anesthesia was associated with a lower 30-day risk of death, MI, or stroke compared to general (RR 0.3; P<0.001) and spinal anesthesia (RR 0.5; P=0.01) in hip fracture surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: