Key result
TAVI was associated with lower 6-month cardiac mortality compared to medical management and BAV (6-month freedom from cardiac death 92.0% for TAVI vs 72.7% for MM and 72.9% for BAV).
Why the study?
Does TAVI improve 6-month cardiac mortality compared to SAVR, BAV, or medical management in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Population
166 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk referred for TAVI
Comparison
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the… vs Surgical aortic valve replacement, balloon…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 9 months (IQR 4.5-12.4 months)
Authors
Loading...
TAVI may lower 6-month cardiac mortality versus BAV or MM in high-risk AS; leaves open randomized comparison with SAVR.
Cohort (n=166)
Yes
Does TAVI improve 6-month cardiac mortality compared to SAVR, BAV, or medical management in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk?
Absolute Event Rate: 92% vs 72.7%
In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, TAVI was associated with lower 6-month cardiac mortality compared to medical management or BAV, and had similar outcomes to SAVR.
Carlo et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk (n=166). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), or medical management (MM) was evaluated on 6-month cardiac mortality (reported as 6-month freedom from cardiac death). TAVI was associated with lower 6-month cardiac mortality compared to medical management and BAV (6-month freedom from cardiac death 92.0% for TAVI vs 72.7% for MM and 72.9% for BAV).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: