Key result
A surrogate fluid-structure interaction model for carotid plaque produced wall displacement mismatches 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower than the spatial resolution of the original MRI data.
Why the study?
Does a surrogate FSI model calibrated by cine MRI accurately simulate blood dynamics and wall displacements in carotid arteries with >70% stenosis compared to full FSI models?
Does a surrogate FSI model calibrated by cine MRI accurately simulate blood dynamics and wall displacements in carotid arteries with >70% stenosis compared to full FSI models?
A novel surrogate FSI model calibrated with cine MRI data accurately simulates carotid artery wall displacements and fluid dynamics in patients with severe stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surrogate FSI models may enable efficient carotid simulations; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
We propose a surrogate model for the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) problem for the study of blood dynamics in carotid arteries in presence of plaque. This is based on the integration of a numerical model with subject-specific data and clinical imaging. We propose to model the plaque as part of the tissues surrounding the vessel wall through the application of an elastic support boundary condition. In order to characterize the plaque and other surrounding tissues, such as the close-by jugular vein, the elastic parameters of the boundary condition were spatially differentiated and their values were estimated by minimizing the discrepancies between computed vessel displacements and reference values obtained from CINE Magnetic Resonance Imaging data. We applied the model to three subjects with a degree of stenosis greater than 70%. We found that accounting for both plaque and jugular vein in the estimation of the elastic parameters increases the accuracy. In particular, in all patients, mismatches between computed and in vivo measured wall displacements were one to two orders of magnitude lower than the spatial resolution of the original MRI data. These results confirmed the validity of the proposed surrogate plaque model. We also compared fluid-dynamics results with those obtained in a fixed wall setting and in a full FSI model, used as gold standard, highlighting the better accordance of our results in comparison to the rigid ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pozzi et al. (2021) studied Carotid artery stenosis (n=3). Surrogate fluid-structure interaction model vs. Fixed wall setting and full FSI model was evaluated on Mismatches between computed and in vivo measured wall displacements. A surrogate fluid-structure interaction model for carotid plaque produced wall displacement mismatches 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower than the spatial resolution of the original MRI data.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: