Why the study?
LBBB causes left atrial dyssynchrony, but its underlying mechanisms and impact on long-term prognosis during CRT were unknown.
Does the resolution of left atrial dyssynchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy impact long-term prognosis in heart failure patients with LBBB?
Does the resolution of left atrial dyssynchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy impact long-term prognosis in heart failure patients with LBBB?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In heart failure patients with LBBB, the resolution of left atrial dyssynchrony combined with preserved LA reservoir strain after 6 months of CRT is a strong predictor of excellent long-term survival.
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) causes left atrial (LA) dyssynchrony. It is unknown if LA dyssynchrony impacts long-term prognosis. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine mechanisms of LA dyssynchrony in LBBB and if LA dyssynchrony impacts long-term prognosis. METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study of 168 heart failure patients with LBBB, echocardiographic strain imaging was done before and after 6 months with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Outcome was assessed after 6 years. Dyssynchrony was measured relative to septum as delay in left ventricular (LV) lateral wall shortening and LA lateral wall stretch. Response to CRT was defined as at least 15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume. RESULTS: Before CRT, there was marked LA dyssynchrony of 105 ± 76 ms, which decreased to 37 ± 68 ms in CRT-responders (P < 0.001), whereas nonresponders showed only a modest reduction in LA dyssynchrony (P < 0.05). There was strong association between LA and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.70), consistent with direct LV-LA mechanical interaction. CRT caused modest increase in LA reservoir strain (P < 0.01) and marked increase of LV filling time (P < 0.001) in responders. Mortality after 6 years was 21% (35 deaths). LA dyssynchrony did not independently predict mortality. However, the combination of preserved LA reservoir strain (≥18%) and resolved LA dyssynchrony (≤53 ms) after 6 months with CRT was associated with excellent long term-prognosis: HR: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.42) vs preserved reservoir strain and persistent LA dyssynchrony. CONCLUSIONS: LA dyssynchrony in LBBB was attributed to direct LV-LA mechanical interactions. CRT improved diastolic function by increasing LV filling time. Patients with preserved LA reservoir strain and resolution of LA dyssynchrony by CRT had excellent long-term prognosis. (Contractile Reserve in Dyssynchrony: A Novel Principle to Identify Candidates for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [CRID-CRT]; NCT02525185).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammersboen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: