Key result
Omnipolar mapping identifies ~74% higher global voltages and better last-deflection annotation than bipolar mapping in rTOF.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether omnipolar mapping provides a more accurate characterization of the arrhythmic substrate than bipolar mapping in repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.
Does omnipolar mapping improve the characterization of the arrhythmic substrate compared to bipolar mapping in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot?
Cross-Sectional (n=12)
Does omnipolar mapping improve the characterization of the arrhythmic substrate compared to bipolar mapping in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot?
Omnipolar mapping provides higher voltage values, smaller abnormal voltage areas, and more accurate ILAM annotation than conventional bipolar mapping in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OM may refine SCAI mapping in rTOF; hypothesis-generating for clinical adoption pending outcome trials.
Background High-density electroanatomical mapping enables the characterization of the arrhythmic substrate in patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF), facilitating the identification and ablation of slow-conducting anatomical isthmuses (SCAIs) responsible for ventricular tachycardia. It is unknown whether the use of omnipolar mapping (OM) technology provides a more accurate characterization of the arrhythmic substrate in this setting. Purpose To investigate the differences between voltage maps and isochronal late activation mapping (ILAM) derived from bipolar and omnipolar signals, and to assess the correlation between voltage values obtained by each method in patients with rTOF. Methods Electroanatomical maps from 12 patients with rTOF were analysed using omnipolar mapping, from which corresponding bipolar maps were derived. Omnipolar and bipolar voltages were compared, as well as the automated last-deflection annotation error. Differences in the areas of anatomical isthmuses obtained with each mapping modality were evaluated. Results OM identified significantly higher median global voltages (0.99 mV [0.42–2.91] vs 0.57 mV [0.26–1.43], p < 0.01). The area of abnormal voltage was significantly smaller with OM (64.51 cm² [50.86–52.45] vs 79.43 cm² [54.48–95.13], p = 0.012), with a relative voltage difference of 12.9% (53.7% by OM and 64.05% by bipolar mapping). OM showed higher point density (20.06 points/cm² [12.68–23.19] vs 15.20 points/cm² [12.75–19.26], p < 0.01). Last-deflection annotation was more accurate with OM, with a lower ILAM algorithm automatic error rate (6.6 ± 7 vs 16.6 ± 9; paired-samples W: 3.0, p = 0.01). Seven SCAI areas were measured, with OM showing a smaller area compared with bipolar (2.65 cm² [1.65–3.8] vs. 4.4 cm² [2.4–5.2]), with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.18). Conclusion OM demonstrated significantly higher voltage values and a smaller area of abnormal voltage, and the area of the SCAIs in OM showed a non-significant trend towards a smaller size. Omnipolar ILAM annotation was significantly more accurate than conventional bipolar mapping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baizan et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (n=12). Omnipolar mapping vs. Bipolar mapping was evaluated on Median global voltages (p=<0.01). Omnipolar mapping identified higher median global voltages and more accurate last-deflection annotation than bipolar mapping in patients with rTOF.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: