Key result
A two-step risk stratification algorithm including programmed ventricular stimulation predicted major arrhythmic events in post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% with 100% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity.
Why the study?
To evaluate the long-term performance of a two-step, programmed ventricular stimulation-inclusive risk stratification approach for identifying post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% at high arrhythmic risk who could benefit from an ICD.
Does a two-step risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation predict major arrhythmic events in post-myocardial infarction patients with LVEF ≥40%?
Observational (n=575)
Does a two-step risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation predict major arrhythmic events in post-myocardial infarction patients with LVEF ≥40%?
A two-step risk stratification approach using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation effectively identifies post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% at risk for major arrhythmic events, with a 100% negative predictive value.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combined NIRF-PVS strategy for ICD selection decisions; extends prior validation with long-term confirmation in a large cohort.
Background The PRESERVE EF study proposed a two-step algorithm for risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with mid-range and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Purpose The PRESERVE EF study assessed the performance of a multifactorial, two-step, programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS)-inclusive approach in identifying the high-risk post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% who are at increased arrhythmic risk and would benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This report presents the 8-year follow-up findings of the trial. Methods The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation or sudden cardiac death (SCD). We screened and included 575 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years, LVEF 50.8%). Of them, 204 (35.5%) had at least one positive NIRF. Forty-one of 152 patients undergoing PVS were inducible. Thirty seven (90.2%) of them received an ICD. Results Over a mean follow-up of 106 ± 14.5 months, no SCDs were observed, while 12 ICDs (the major arrhythmic events prevalence in patients with ICD implantation reaching 29.3%) were appropriately activated. The updated (8.8-year follow-up) performance metrics of the proposed approach (included both steps with NIRFs and PVS) were as follows: Sensitivity= 100%, specificity= 94.8%, positive predictive value= 29.3%, and negative predictive value= 100%. Notably, events occurred only in patients with an LVEF 40-50% and STEMI. Conclusions Until a randomized trial provides a survival benefit in post-myocardial infraction patients with preserved LVEF, the PRESERVE EF study remains the only evidence based risk assessment approach, despite its observational structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doundoulakis et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Post-myocardial infarction with preserved ejection fraction (n=575). Two-step risk stratification algorithm including programmed ventricular stimulation was evaluated on Major arrhythmic event (MAE), namely sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation or sudden cardiac death (SCD). A two-step risk stratification algorithm including programmed ventricular stimulation predicted major arrhythmic events in post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% with 100% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: