Key result
Two-step risk stratification identifies high-risk post-MI patients, with major arrhythmic events reaching ~29% in inducible cases.
Why the study?
The PRESERVE EF study aimed to assess the long-term performance of a two-step, programmed ventricular stimulation-inclusive algorithm for arrhythmic risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction patients with LVEF ≥40%.
Does a two-step risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation identify high-risk post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% for major arrhythmic events?
Cohort (n=575)
Yes
Does a two-step risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation identify high-risk post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% for major arrhythmic events?
Absolute Event Rate: 29.3% vs 0%
A two-step risk stratification algorithm using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation effectively identifies post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40% who are at high risk for major arrhythmic events and may benefit from an ICD.
Supports a two-step risk stratification approach for post-MI patients with preserved ejection fraction; leaves open.
Introduction: The PRESERVE EF study proposed a two-step algorithm for risk stratification in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with mid-range and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This method assessed the performance of a two-step, programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS)-inclusive approach in identifying high-risk post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40%. This report presents findings from the 8-year follow-up. Methods: The primary endpoint was the occurrence of a major arrhythmic event, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activation, or sudden cardiac death (SCD). We included a total of 575 consecutive patients (mean age 57 years, LVEF 50.8%). Of them, 204 (35.5%) had at least one positive non-invasive risk factor. Forty-one of 152 patients undergoing PVS were inducible; 37 (90.2%) of them received an ICD. Results: During a mean follow-up of 106 ± 14.5 months, no SCDs were observed, while 12 ICDs (the major arrhythmic event prevalence in patients with ICD implantation reaching 29.3%) were appropriately activated. The updated performance metrics of the proposed approach were as follows: sensitivity 100% (95% CI: 73.5%-100%), specificity 94.8% (95% CI: 92.5-96.5%), positive predictive value 29.3% (95% CI: 17.2-45.0%), and negative predictive value 100% (95% CI: 99.3%-100%). Notably, events occurred only in patients with an LVEF 40%-50% and a history of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Conclusion: The PRESERVE EF study demonstrates that a simple, two-step, non-invasive risk factor-guided approach, followed by programmed ventricular stimulation, can effectively identify a subgroup of post-MI patients with preserved or mid-range LVEF ≥40 who are at high risk for major arrhythmic events. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02124018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doundoulakis et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Post-myocardial infarction with preserved ejection fraction (n=575). Two-step risk stratification algorithm (non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation) vs. Non-inducible patients or patients without non-invasive risk factors was evaluated on Major arrhythmic event (sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, appropriate ICD activation, or sudden cardiac death). A two-step risk stratification approach using non-invasive risk factors and programmed ventricular stimulation identified high-risk post-MI patients with LVEF ≥40%, with 29.3% of inducible patients experiencing a major arrhythmic event over 106 months compared to 0% in non-inducible patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: