Key result
Preclinical db/db model reduces radial strain by ~8 percentage points vs. wild-type controls.
The db/db mouse model presents early, detectable ultrasonographic signs of multi-organ damage, particularly cardiac and renal dysfunction, validating its utility for noninvasive metabolic and cardiovascular research.
The availability of an animal model able to reliably mirror organ damage occurring in metabolic diseases is an urgent need. These models, mostly rodents, have not been fully characterized in terms of cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic ultrasound parameters, and only sparse values can be found in literature. Aim of this paper is to provide a detailed, noninvasive description of the heart, vessels, liver, and kidneys of the db/db mouse by ultrasound imaging. Sixteen wild type and thirty-four db/db male mice (11-week-old) were studied. State-of-the-art ultrasound technology was used to acquire images of cardiovascular, renal, and hepatic districts. A set of parameters describing function of the selected organs was evaluated. db/db mice are characterized by systolic and diastolic dysfunction, confirmed by strain analysis. Abdominal aortic and carotid stiffness do not seem to be increased in diabetic rodents; furthermore, they are characterized by a smaller mean diameter for both vessels. Renal microcirculation is significantly compromised, while liver steatosis is only slightly higher in db/db mice than in controls. We offer here for the first time an in vivo detailed ultrasonographic characterization of the db/db mouse, providing a useful tool for a thoughtful choice of the right rodent model for any experimental design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faita et al. (2018) studied Metabolic abnormalities (n=50). db/db genotype vs. Wild-type C57BL6 genotype was evaluated on Radial strain (p=<0.01). The db/db mouse model exhibited significant systolic and diastolic dysfunction compared to wild-type controls, including reduced radial strain (32.22% vs 39.74%, p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: