Key result
Survival without cardiovascular events at 5 years in patients with vasospastic angina was 96% both before and after 1990, with benidipine showing a better prognosis among calcium channel blockers.
Why the study?
Does the introduction of new calcium channel blockers (benidipine and amlodipine) alter the long-term prognosis and prognostic factors of patients with vasospastic angina?
Population
726 patients with vasospastic angina registered from January 1980 to December 2002
Comparison
Treatment with new calcium channel blockers vs Historical cohort treated before 1990
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
5 years
Authors
Loading...
Updated VSA prognosis data after newer CCB introduction; leaves open whether benidipine or amlodipine alters long-term outcomes.
Cohort (n=726)
Does the introduction of new calcium channel blockers (benidipine and amlodipine) alter the long-term prognosis and prognostic factors of patients with vasospastic angina?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 96%
The long-term prognosis of vasospastic angina remains excellent in the era of new calcium channel blockers, though risk factors like diabetes, smoking, and prior MI have become more influential prognosticators.
Itô et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Vasospastic angina (n=726). Era after 1990 (introduction of new calcium channel blockers) vs. Era before 1990 was evaluated on Survival without cardiovascular events at 5 years. Survival without cardiovascular events at 5 years in patients with vasospastic angina was 96% both before and after 1990, with benidipine showing a better prognosis among calcium channel blockers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: