Key result
ACS presentation in vasospastic angina is linked to ~65% higher risk of major cardiovascular events.
Cohort (n=986)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows increased risk of recurrent myocardial infarction in vasospastic angina presenting with acute coronary syndrome, indicating the need for intensive medical therapy.
BACKGROUND: Coronary vasospasm is an important pathogenesis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the clinical features and prognosis of vasospastic angina (VA) patients presenting with ACS (VAACS) are still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of VAACS patients without significant coronary artery stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 986 VA patients confirmed by ergonovine provocation test were analyzed. VAACS was defined as VA patients visiting the emergency room with documented electrocardiographic changes, significant arrhythmias, or elevated cardiac biomarkers. VA patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers were further considered to have myocardial infarction (MI; VAMI). During 4.4 years of median follow-up, we investigated major adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, MI, revascularization, and rehospitalization because of recurrent angina. The VAACS group consisted of 149 patients (15.1%), and VAMI occurred in 81 patients (8.2%). VAACS patients were younger and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, MI history, and higher levels of inflammatory markers compared with non-VAACS patients. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, VAACS patients were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% CI 1.14-2.37; P=0.007) and recurrent MI hazard ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.35-4.87; P=0.004). In addition, VAMI patients had an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.11-2.76; P=0.016) and recurrent MI (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.09-5.40; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: VAACS patients showed worse clinical outcomes, driven mainly by recurrent MI. Therefore, intensive medical treatment might be required in VAACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Vasospastic angina presenting with acute coronary syndrome (n=986). Vasospastic angina presenting with acute coronary syndrome (VAACS) vs. Non-VAACS vasospastic angina patients was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and rehospitalization because of recurrent angina) (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.14-2.37, p=0.007). Vasospastic angina presenting with acute coronary syndrome increased the risk of major adverse cardiac events compared with non-ACS presentation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: