Key result
Initial presentation with acute myocardial infarction in coronary artery spasm patients was associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 10.94; 95% CI 3.83-31.22; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does initial presentation with acute myocardial infarction worsen long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery spasm?
Population
3360 patients confirmed as having coronary artery spasm by the acetylcholine provocation test and without…
Comparison
Initial presentation with acute myocardial… vs Initial presentation without AMI.
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 1211±583 days
Authors
Loading...
CAS-MI patients may warrant closer surveillance; leaves open whether tailored strategies improve outcomes in this subgroup.
Cohort (n=3,360)
Does initial presentation with acute myocardial infarction worsen long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery spasm?
Hazard Ratio: 10.94 (95% CI 3.83–31.22)
p-value: p=<0.001
Patients with coronary artery spasm who initially present with an acute myocardial infarction have a significantly higher long-term risk of recurrent angina, MI, and MACE, suggesting a need for more intensive antispastic therapy.
Kim et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery spasm (n=3,360). Initial presentation with acute myocardial infarction vs. Initial presentation without acute myocardial infarction was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (HR 10.94, 95% CI 3.83-31.22, p=<0.001). Initial presentation with acute myocardial infarction in coronary artery spasm patients was associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 10.94; 95% CI 3.83-31.22; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: