Key result
Chelation therapy fails to reduce cardiovascular events in TACT2 despite earlier modest benefits.
Why the study?
Chelation therapy has been explored as an alternative treatment for atherosclerotic CAD, but findings from trials such as TACT and TACT2 have yielded conflicting efficacy results.
Does chelation therapy reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does chelation therapy reduce cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease?
Recent evidence from TACT2 fails to confirm the modest cardiovascular benefits of chelation therapy previously observed in the TACT trial for patients with CAD and diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chelation should not yet alter CAD practice; leaves open efficacy questions in diabetes subgroups.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is responsible for 690,000 deaths a year, a leading cause of mortality worldwide. CAD results from cholesterol plaque buildup in arteries. Chelation therapy, which uses ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid to remove toxic metals from the bloodstream, has been explored as an alternative treatment for atherosclerotic CAD. While the 2013 Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) trial showed modest cardiovascular benefits, particularly in patients with diabetes, subsequent studies such as TACT2 did not confirm its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Adverse effects of chelation therapy could include renal dysfunction, electrolyte imbalances, and potential complications from heavy metal mobilization that could be fatal. Still, none of these were seen in TACT or TACT2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2025) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Chelation therapy was evaluated on Cardiovascular events. Chelation therapy showed modest cardiovascular benefits in the TACT trial for patients with diabetes, but the subsequent TACT2 trial did not confirm its efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: