Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates renal function decline in type 2 diabetes patients with high-intensity activity, indicating no significant effect.
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: While physical activity (PA) is associated in observational studies with cardiovascular and renal protection few interventional studies have assessed its long-term effect on renal outcomes. This study is the first to specifically evaluate the impact of high-intensity PA on the slowing of renal function decline in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients at high risk for kidney disease. METHODS: ActiDiaNe is an open, randomized controlled trial involving patients with T2D (pT2D) and rapid renal function decline (eGFR slope < -5 ml/min/year over 6-24 months). Participants were randomized to high-intensity PA (HIPA) or standard PA counseling (STPA) for two years. The primary endpoint was the slope of decline in cystatin C-derived eGFR (cys-eGFR). RESULTS: Across 21 centers, 178 patients were screened, 122 randomized, and 103 (29 women/74 men) analyzed for the primary endpoint (59 HIPA vs. 44 STPA). At baseline, mean age was 66 ± 8 years, median cys-eGFR was 54 ml/min/1.73m² (37; 65), and median eGFR decline was -9 ml/min/year (-12; -7). The primary endpoint showed a decline of -2.05 ml/min/year (95% CI: -3.46 to -0.64) in HIPA vs. -2.77 ml/min/year (95% CI: -4.40 to -1.14) in STPA (P = 0.512). Cardiovascular events and deaths occurred in 10 (17%) HIPA vs. 6 (14%) STPA patients (P = 0.646), with 3 deaths in HIPA (none of them protocol-related). Hypoglycemia was reported in 32 HIPA vs. 26 STPA patients (P = 0.623). CONCLUSION: In pT2D with rapid renal function decline, HIPA did not significantly alter renal function decline compared to STPA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadjadj et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: