Key result
Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm achieved complete shunt closure at last follow-up in 100% of single fenestration and 99% of multifenestrated cases (P=0.12).
Why the study?
The feasibility, efficacy, and long-term outcome of transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm needed to be evaluated.
Is transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm feasible, safe, and effective in achieving long-term shunt closure?
Observational (n=568)
Yes
Is transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm feasible, safe, and effective in achieving long-term shunt closure?
Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysms is highly feasible and safe, achieving excellent long-term shunt closure rates even in multifenestrated anatomies.
May support transcatheter fenestrated ASA closure in selected patients; leaves open need for randomized efficacy trials.
AIM: To report on the feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome of transcatheter closure of fenestrated Atrial Septal Aneurysm (ASA). METHODS: Between April 2000 and May 2020, 568 patients with fenestrated ASA underwent transcatheter closure at two large-volume Pediatric Cardiology and GUCH Units (Naples and Massa, Italy). Procedural indications were cardiac volume overload in 223 patients (39%) or prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization in 345 patients (61%). Patients' median age and weight were 42 years (range 19-52) and 66 kg (range 54-79), respectively. One-hundred and thirty-nine patients (25%) were younger than 18 years. RESULTS: Single fenestration was found in 311 patients (55%) (Group 1), whereas 257 patients (45%) had multifenestrated ASA (Group 2). The procedure was successful in all but seven patients (1.2%). In Group 1, closure was achieved with a single device. In Group 2, one device was used in 168 patients (67%), two devices in 74 patients (28%), three devices in 12 patients (5%), and four devices in 1 patient (0.3%). The early complication rate was 3%, without any difference according to anatomy or patient's age. At discharge, complete shunt closure was higher in Group 1 (92% vs. 72%, P < 0.0001), without any difference between groups at the last follow-up evaluation (100% vs. 99%, P = 0.12). Procedural safety was persistent during the long-term follow-up (mean 7.2 ± 5.4, range 0-19 years): freedom from adverse events was 97% at 10-15 years. Seventeen patients (3%) were submitted to reintervention, mostly as prophylaxis of paradoxical embolization. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter closure of perforated ASA is technically feasible in a high percentage of cases, with excellent long-term outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm (n=568). Transcatheter closure (single fenestration) vs. Transcatheter closure (multifenestrated) was evaluated on Complete shunt closure at last follow-up (p=0.12). Transcatheter closure of fenestrated atrial septal aneurysm achieved complete shunt closure at last follow-up in 100% of single fenestration and 99% of multifenestrated cases (P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: