Key result
Transcatheter closure of complex atrial septal defects achieved 95.9% occlusion at follow-up, but had higher procedure-related complications compared to simple ASD closure (12.5%, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does transcatheter closure of complex ASDs achieve similar occlusion rates and safety compared to simple ASD closure?
Cohort (n=209)
No
Does transcatheter closure of complex ASDs achieve similar occlusion rates and safety compared to simple ASD closure?
Transcatheter closure of complex ASDs is feasible and achieves similar mid-term occlusion rates to simple ASDs, though it is more technically demanding and associated with a higher complication rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Requires caution for complex ASD closure due to higher complications; leaves open optimal selection and safety in prospective studies.
OBJECTIVE: Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is currently a reliable alternative to surgery, even though challenging in the case of complex septal anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term results of percutaneous closure of complex ASDs in a tertiary referral centre compared with simple ASD closure. METHODS: Between April 2000 and November 2004, 209 patients were submitted to transcatheter ASD closure; 83 patients (39.7%) presented with a complex defect (large ASDs with a deficient rim or a multifenestrated/aneurysmal septum) and were treated using different devices tailored to the atrial septal anatomy. RESULTS: The transcatheter procedure was successful in 72 patients (86.8%), using a single device in 69 patients and two devices in the remaining three patients. Overall, 71 Amplatzer septal occluders, two multifenestrated Amplatzer septal occluders and two Cardioseal/Starflex devices were used. Procedural and fluoroscopy times were 141 +/- 45 min and 28 +/- 22 min, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons). Procedure-related complications were recorded in nine patients (12.5%) (P < 0.01 vs. simple ASD closure). One patient required surgical repair of a femoral arteriovenous fistula and another developed mitral valve dysfunction. Immediate ASD occlusion was recorded in 59.7% of patients, reaching 95.9% at the last follow-up control (P = NS vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous closure of complex ASDs may be considered technically feasible, relatively safe and highly effective, although the procedure is still significantly more demanding than transcatheter closure of simple ASDs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santoro et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Atrial septal defects (n=209). Transcatheter closure of complex ASDs vs. Transcatheter closure of simple ASDs was evaluated on Procedure-related complications (p=<0.01). Transcatheter closure of complex atrial septal defects achieved 95.9% occlusion at follow-up, but had higher procedure-related complications compared to simple ASD closure (12.5%, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: