Key result
In patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure with LVEF ≤40%, baseline ICD presence was associated with similar adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83-1.22) but higher HF rehospitalization.
Why the study?
Does the presence of an ICD at the time of hospitalization for worsening heart failure affect postdischarge mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Population
3,702 patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%…
Comparison
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator present… vs No electrophysiological device at the time of…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 300 days
Authors
Loading...
ICD not associated with lower mortality but higher HF rehospitalization after adjustment; challenges unadjusted benefits and leaves open optimization strategies.
Cohort (n=3,702)
Does the presence of an ICD at the time of hospitalization for worsening heart failure affect postdischarge mortality and heart failure rehospitalization in patients with LVEF ≤40%?
Hazard Ratio: 1.01 (95% CI 0.83–1.22)
Absolute Event Rate: 35.2% vs 22.9%
In patients hospitalized for worsening HFrEF, having an ICD at presentation is associated with similar mortality but higher rates of heart failure rehospitalization compared to those without a device.
Wang et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (n=3,702). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vs. No electrophysiological device was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.83-1.22). In patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure with LVEF ≤40%, baseline ICD presence was associated with similar adjusted all-cause mortality (HR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83-1.22) but higher HF rehospitalization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: