Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational study compares azacitidine effects in elderly versus younger patients with higher-risk MDS, indicating high tolerability and response rates.
Background/Objectives: Azacitidine (AZA) is the standard of care for patients with higher-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS). There is limited real-life data, however, characterizing its efficacy and safety profile in elderly patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort chart review to compare front-line AZA therapy in patients ≥75 years (elderly) vs. <75 years (younger) with higher-risk MDS treated at our cancer center. The primary endpoint was overall survival and main secondary endpoints included response, as per the 2006 International Working Group consensus criteria, leukemia-free survival, transfusion independence, and safety outcomes. Results: In total, 55 patients were elderly (median age: 79.9 years), including 27 patients >80 years, and 41 were younger (median age: 69.4 years). Baseline demographic variables were similar between both groups. The majority of elderly patients (98%) received the full dose of AZA (75 mg/m2), compared with 90% of younger patients. The median number of AZA cycles was 8 (range: 2–69) in elderly and 7.75 (range: 1–96) in younger patients. Treatment delays occurred in 36.4% of elderly and 29.3% of younger patients, most commonly due to infection complications in both groups (p = 0.076). Disease control rates (complete remission + partial remission + stable disease) were 92.9% in the younger subgroup and 96.4% in the elderly subgroup (p = 0.154). Relapse occurred in 48.8% of younger patients and 40.0% of elderly patients. Median overall survival (OS) was 17.3 months for the younger subgroup, 15.7 months for the elderly subgroup (p = 0.771), and 11.9 months among patients >80 years (p = 0.381). Mortality rates and causes of death were similar between both subgroups. Most common causes of death included disease progression, sepsis, febrile neutropenia, and pneumonia. Conclusions: AZA monotherapy resulted in a high response rate and was well-tolerated in elderly patients with higher-risk MDS. These findings remain consistent in the real-world setting despite potential confounding factors that may contribute to inferior outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: