Key result
Aortic dissection incidence was estimated across 195 countries and 54 regions worldwide to inform targeted public health policies and disease prevention.
Why the study?
Past studies have focused on in-hospital and follow-up mortality of aortic dissection, but a global epidemiology review and incidence data are lacking.
This review provides a global epidemiological analysis of aortic dissection incidence and risk factors to help target key populations and develop public health policies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Global data gaps limit precise risk targeting; leaves open need for standardized registries to refine prevention strategies.
Aortic dissection is a highly fatal disease with limited predictability requiring emergency response. It remains a challenging clinical problem and has a reported lower 5-year survival rate, especially in acute cases. Studying the epidemiology of aortic dissection can be important for targeting key populations and developing public health policies. Past studies have focused more on the in-hospital and follow-up mortality associated with aortic dissection but the global epidemiology review is still lacking. Incidence data have rarely been generated or provided. We estimated and analyzed the incidence of aortic dissection in all 195 countries and 54 regions worldwide and in the population structures of 15 selected countries. We further reviewed risk factors and baseline characteristics related to aortic dissection. We outlined the topic in terms of the biological, social, environmental, and psychosocial factors. Public health departments should screen target groups and key regions and introduce policies for disease prevention and relieve the high medical burdens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2022) conducted a review in Aortic dissection. Aortic dissection was evaluated on Incidence of aortic dissection. Aortic dissection incidence was estimated across 195 countries and 54 regions worldwide to inform targeted public health policies and disease prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: