Key result
Higher baseline ischemic myocardium is linked to ~16% higher odds of ischemia reduction after CTO-PCI.
Why the study?
The clinical effectiveness of CTO-PCI varies, and the value of baseline ischemic burden assessed by SPECT for predicting benefit remains uncertain.
Does higher baseline ischemic burden assessed by SPECT predict significant ischemia reduction and 24-month health status improvement in patients undergoing successful CTO-PCI?
Cohort (n=74)
Does higher baseline ischemic burden assessed by SPECT predict significant ischemia reduction and 24-month health status improvement in patients undergoing successful CTO-PCI?
Higher baseline SPECT-derived ischemic burden (optimal cutoff 13.0%) and LAD-CTO independently predict significant ischemia reduction and greater 24-month angina relief following successful CTO-PCI.
Higher baseline ischemia was associated with post-CTO-PCI reduction; hypothesis-generating for randomized outcome trials.
Background and purpose: Although percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion (CTO-PCI) is performed to reduce ischemia and relieve symptoms, its clinical effectiveness varies, and the value of baseline ischemic burden assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for predicting benefit remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the reduction in ischemic burden after successful CTO-PCI, identify baseline and angiographic factors associated with significant ischemia improvement, and examine whether ischemia reduction was associated with subsequent improvement in angina and health status. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent successful CTO-PCI received SPECT imaging before and within 3 days after the procedure to quantify myocardial ischemia. Health status was assessed at baseline and 24 months using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Significant ischemia improvement was defined as an absolute reduction of ≥5% in ischemic myocardium. Results: The study included 74 patients (mean age: 57.2 ± 12.5 years; 89.2% male), of whom 29 (39.2%) achieved significant ischemia improvement. Compared with patients without improvement, those with improvement had a lower prevalence of hypertension (41.4% vs. 75.6%; P = 0.003), greater baseline ischemic myocardium (20.6% ± 12.7% vs. 9.6% ± 6.9%; P < 0.001), and a larger reduction in ischemic myocardium (8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 1.6% ± 2.5%; P < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, sex (male vs. female: odds ratio [OR]: 0.093, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.011–0.819; P = 0.032), baseline ischemic myocardium (OR: 1.156, 95% CI: 1.052–1.269; P = 0.003), and left anterior descending artery CTO (LAD-CTO; OR: 5.132, 95% CI: 1.122–23.478; P = 0.035) were independently associated with ischemia improvement. Baseline ischemic burden predicted a ≥5% reduction in ischemia with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.800 and an optimal cutoff of 13.0%. Discrimination was particularly high in patients with LAD-CTO. At 24 months, improvements in all SAQ domains were greater among patients with ischemia improvement than among those without improvement. Conclusions: Successful CTO-PCI was associated with greater reductions in ischemia and greater symptomatic improvement among patients with a higher baseline SPECT-derived ischemic burden, particularly those with LAD-CTO. Baseline ischemic burden may help identify patients most likely to benefit from CTO-PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudharsono et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Chronic total occlusion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI) (n=74). Baseline ischemic myocardium assessed by SPECT before successful CTO-PCI vs. Patients without significant ischemia improvement (<5% reduction in ischemic myocardium) was evaluated on Significant ischemia improvement (defined as an absolute reduction of ≥5% in ischemic myocardium) (OR 1.156, 95% CI 1.052-1.269, p=0.003). Higher baseline SPECT ischemic myocardium independently predicted ≥5% ischemia reduction after CTO-PCI (OR 1.156; 95% CI 1.052-1.269; P=0.003; AUC 0.800).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: