Why the study?
The benefit of PCI in chronic total coronary occlusion remains controversial, and changes in absolute myocardial perfusion determined by PET in CTO and remote territories before and after PCI required exploration.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic total occlusion?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention improve stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in patients with chronic total occlusion?
PCI in patients with CTO significantly improves stress myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve in both CTO territories and remote regions, suggesting widespread recovery of blood perfusion.
PCI improves stress MBF and CFR on PET after CTO revascularization; supports perfusion-guided trials but leaves clinical outcome impact open.
Objective. The benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic complete coronary artery occlusion (CTO) remains controversial. PCI is currently indicated only for symptom and myocardial ischemia abolition, but large chronically occluded vessels with extensive afferent myocardial territories may benefit most from this procedure. The noninvasive evaluation of myocardial perfusion is critical before and after revascularization, and positron emission tomography (PET) can determine absolute myocardial perfusion. Here, we aimed to explore and compare myocardial perfusion in CTO territories and their remote associated areas before and after PCI. Design. We searched for relevant articles published before November 28, 2022, in the Cochrane Library and PubMed. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for parameters related to myocardial perfusion in CTO territories and remote areas in CTO patients before and after PCI. Results. We included five studies published between 2017 and 2022, with a total of 592 patients. Stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) was increased in CTO territories after PCI when compared to pre-PCI (mean difference [MD]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.08, p < 0.001). Coronary flow reserve (CFR) in CTO regions was also higher after PCI (MD 1.37,95% [CI]1.13-1.61, p < 0.001). Stress MBF in remote regions was also increased after PCI (MD 0.27,95% [CI]0.99 ∼ 0.45, p = 0.004), as was CFR in remote regions (MD 0.32,95% [CI] 0.14-0.5, p = 0.001). Conclusions. According to our pooled analysis of current literature, there was an increase in stress MBF and CFR in both CTOs and remote regions after PCI, suggesting that patients with CTO have widespread recovery of blood perfusion after the procedure. These results provide evidence that patients with CTO arteries and high ischemic burdens would indeed benefit from CTO-PCI. Future research on the correlation of ischemia burden reduction with hard clinical endpoints would contribute to a clearer demarcation of the role of CTO PCI with prognostic potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: