Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants were increasingly used for cardioversion and associated with a low 30-day ischemic stroke rate of 0.29%, compared to 0.8% with warfarin and 5.5% without anticoagulation.
Why the study?
Increasing reports suggest safe use of DOACs in electrical cardioversion, prompting an assessment of trends and 30-day outcomes associated with anticoagulation for cardioversion.
Are direct oral anticoagulants safe and effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter?
Cohort (n=515)
No
Are direct oral anticoagulants safe and effective compared to warfarin for stroke prevention in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/flutter?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.29% vs 0.8%
The use of DOACs, particularly apixaban, for electrical cardioversion has increased significantly and is associated with low 30-day rates of ischemic stroke and bleeding.
May inform periprocedural anticoagulation choices in AF; leaves open need for prospective validation of DOAC regimens.
Background: Increasing reports suggest the safe use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in electrical cardioversion. The aim of this study was to assess the trends and 30-day outcomes associated with anticoagulation for cardioversion. Methods: Patients who underwent electrical cardioversion from January 2015 to October 2020 with a 30-day follow-up were included; and outcomes including stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and major gastrointestinal bleeding were recorded. Results: VASc score of 2.6 ± 1.6. Outpatient apixaban use increased from 10% in 2015 to 46% in 2020 (P < 0.001) with a decline in the use of warfarin from 24% in 2015 to 10% in 2020 (P = 0.023). Apixaban use peri-procedurally for cardioversion increased from 32% in 2015 to 35% in 2020 (P = 0.317), while warfarin use decreased from 23% in 2015 to 14% in 2020 (P = 0.164). At discharge, apixaban prescriptions increased from 21% in 2015 to 61% in 2020 (P < 0.001), while warfarin prescriptions declined from 30% in 2015 to 13% in 2020 (P = 0.009). No ICH was recorded in the 30 days after cardioversion. Ischemic stroke occurred in four (0.7%) patients with one (0.29%) of the 338 patients on a DOAC, one (0.8%) of the 124 patients on warfarin and two (5.5%) of the 36 patients not receiving anticoagulation post cardioversion. There were seven (1%) major gastrointestinal bleeding events in patients on oral anticoagulation, of which four (3%) were on warfarin and three (0.8%) were on DOACs. Conclusions: Our study shows the increasing and safe use of DOACs for the purpose of cardioversion. The rates of 30-day ischemic stroke post cardioversion were low and only occurred in patients admitted in the intensive care unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arshad et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter (n=515). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Ischemic stroke within 30 days of cardioversion. Direct oral anticoagulants were increasingly used for cardioversion and associated with a low 30-day ischemic stroke rate of 0.29%, compared to 0.8% with warfarin and 5.5% without anticoagulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: