Randomized trial compares solid and shell designs for strength in PLA components, indicating the importance of iterative design refinement.
This study compares solid and shell generatively designed PLA components for material extrusion (MEX) at matched mass targets (100, 150, 200 g). Geometries were generated Generative Design (GD) and manufactured by MEX, then tested in a 30° quasi-static compression rig representing prosthetic heel strike. Solid designs achieved up to 92% higher peak load, but failed abruptly, whereas shells exhibited lower strength but progressive, energy-dissipating failure. Results show that simple shelling of GD outcomes cannot replace iterative GD refinement for weight-critical, load-bearing parts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eikevåg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: