Key result
Mean tissue mitral annular displacement (TMADav) was significantly associated with all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction (HR 0.74), suggesting it could be a reliable alternative to global longitudinal strain.
Why the study?
Although global longitudinal strain predicts prognosis after myocardial infarction, tissue mitral annular displacement is less dependent on image quality, prompting investigation into their relationship and prognostic ability.
Does tissue mitral annular displacement (TMAD) predict outcomes after myocardial infarction compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS)?
Cohort (n=246)
Single-blind
No
Does tissue mitral annular displacement (TMAD) predict outcomes after myocardial infarction compared to global longitudinal strain (GLS)?
This study investigates the prognostic value of tissue mitral annular displacement compared to global longitudinal strain in patients with myocardial infarction.
Background:Global longitudinal strain (GLS) can predict prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI). Tissue mitral annular displacement (TMAD) is another index of longitudinal left ventricular deformity, and is less dependent on image quality than GLS. We investigated the relationship between TMAD and GLS, and their ability to predict outcomes after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iwakura et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Myocardial Infarction (n=246). Tissue Mitral Annular Displacement (TMAD) vs. Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.98, p=0.033). Mean tissue mitral annular displacement (TMADav) was significantly associated with all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction (HR 0.74), suggesting it could be a reliable alternative to global longitudinal strain.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: